# What does it mean for a research ecosystem to be healthy?
Healthy ecosystems are one of those [[Nebulous]] definitions that are best described by shared characteristics, not by a tight definition.
* [[Healthy R+D orgs feel like they have very smooth project rampups with high ceilings]] -- tying
* [[Ideally corporate R+D enables targeted dicking around]]
* [[Ideally corporate R+D enables work on a general purpose technology before it’s specialized]]
* Obviously some of it is that they produce good work, but then the question is “good work as judged by whom?” And also that work is a lagging indicator
* Something about tight connections but also paths in for newcomers
* Something about the viability of new ideas
* Something about not being captured by outside interests
* “Smart people doing good work”
<!-- #questions -->
[Web URL for this note](http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/What+does+it+mean+for+a+research+ecosystem+to+be+healthy)
[Comment on this note](http://via.hypothes.is/http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/What+does+it+mean+for+a+research+ecosystem+to+be+healthy)
<!-- {BearID:F7395B09-4E62-44CA-A638-5D468EFE2ED9-577-00001302F0A33AA6} -->