# Peer review doesn’t catch duplications [Elisabeth #StayingAtHome #StayingAlive Bik on Twitter: “Update!This is a set of (at least) EIGHT papers, from different authors, different hospitals, different cancers, different protein expressions. But with identical Kaplan-Meier curves, tables values, line graphs. See e.g. https://t.co/SmHEMPpEm5… https://t.co/grcaEE5tEI”](https://twitter.com/MicrobiomDigest/status/1266140721716719616) ### Related * [[When you see a position being advocated with no pushback but no action - it means there are a bunch of little frictions in the system]] * [[§Academia and Research]] * [[Academics are incentivized to do peer-reviewed publishable work]] * [[The peer review and citation system incentivizes people to work on things that other people think is interesting]] * [[Is peer review a good idea - paper]] * [[Problems With Peer Review And Alternatives]] * [[Three myths about scientific peer review]] * [[Peer Review- Rodney Brooks]] * [[Lets just get rid of peer review - article]] * [[The Philosophical Basis of Peer Review and the Suppression of Innovation]] * [[The fact that large-scale automated machine reading discovers new cancer-driving mechanisms doesn’t cite big mechanism is a clear failing of peer review]] * [[Unlock ways to share data on peer review]] <!-- #stub --> [Web URL for this note](http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/Peer+review+doesn’t+catch+duplications) [Comment on this note](http://via.hypothes.is/http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/Peer+review+doesn’t+catch+duplications)