# Centralized coordination sometimes stops effort from being repeated in smart ways It makes sense not to repeat effort so [[‘Someone is working on that’]] is a common reason to stop repeated effort. The solution to this is to say why what you’re doing is precisely different than another effort. This another reason why [[Creating tight problem definitions is valuable]] Organizations need a way to avoid saying “this idea is bad forever” but then you don’t want people doing the exact same failed thing. There’s a tension here. * [[The transient nature of most people at DARPA enables ideas to be revisited]] * This problem with centralization would also be avoided if it was *temporary* centralization ([[What if all entities had expiration dates?]]) ### Related * [[Defining clear timescales and scopes for collaborations is a tool to minimize politics]] * [[Politics happens whenever there are three or more people with different goals]] <!-- #stub --> [Web URL for this note](http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/Centralized+coordination+sometimes+stops+effort+from+being+repeated+in+smart+ways) [Comment on this note](http://via.hypothes.is/http://notes.benjaminreinhardt.com/Centralized+coordination+sometimes+stops+effort+from+being+repeated+in+smart+ways)